Foreword
Due to the Earthquake in Christchurch we have decided to postpone Day 2 of this Conference until further notice.
Business Continuity on the 24th February has been postponed.
If we can be of any further assistance please do not hesitate to contact us.
Endorsed by:
A message from John Hamilton, Director, Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management:
The Canterbury earthquake of 04 September 2010 has left its mark on the landscape, in the community and in our psyche. At first blush New Zealand can be proud of the way in which the communities of Canterbury dealt with the impact of the earthquake. Our approach to civil defence emergency management has been truly tested under fire and the results indicate a high degree of resilience in Canterbury. Not surprisingly this emergency will have generated different experiences, lessons and observations across the four Rs of risk reduction, readiness, response and recovery.
While there will be formal reviews undertaken of the response and recovery operations and reports published in due course, this conference provides us with an early opportunity to hear from those who played crucial roles in the emergency and to learn from those who have expertise and experience in disaster risk management in a wider sense. This is an opportunity for us to learn, to check our own assumptions against some of the realities faced in an emergency and importantly, it is the chance to contribute to the further enhancement of our capability and capacity to cope with a major emergency.
As Director of Civil Defence I am pleased to have the co-operation and support of Conferenz and Bright*Star Conferences and Training to assemble the numerous pieces of the jigsaw necessary to bring this conference and its important discussion topics to you and the civil defence emergency management sector. The conference is aimed at those who work in this specialised field.
I anticipate you will find ideas and concepts that you have overlooked in your routine work and I believe you will find material that should be applied in your area to ensure that it is as well prepared and as capable as Canterbury showed it was in early September.
There can be no greater responsibility or greater reward, than assisting others get through an emergency. I recommend you use the conference as a way of refreshing and perhaps expanding your knowledge and abilities so that you are better able to meet your responsibilities to the community in civil defence emergency management.
John Hamilton, Director, Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management
About
Ensuring good preparation, quick response and sustained recovery to disasters and emergencies
The 10th Annual Emergency Management Conference will focus on the Canterbury earthquake and look at many aspects of the disaster including:
- The response – from both a national and local perspective
- Communicating in a disaster
- Developing successful emergency management teams
- Multi-agency coordination and out of town staff integration
- Early lessons identified from MCDEM
Conferenz is pleased to announce the participation and support of the Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management at the 10th Annual Integrated Emergency Management Conference.
Do not miss out on this event with our special price for 2011: Register and pay before 5pm December 16 2010 and pay just $825 + GST for both days – see the registration tab for more details.
The conference program is constantly being updated – please check back for more confirmed speakers and new conference information!
Agenda
Agenda: Day 1
8.30
Registration and coffee
9.00
Opening remarks from the Chair
Clive Manley, Manager Civil Defence and Emergency Management, Auckland Council
9.10
The Canterbury Earthquake - A reminder of the value of preparedness (Ministerial Address)
• The foundations of resilience
• The Government’s role in the response and recovery
• Where to now?
Hon John Carter, Minister of Civil Defence
9.40
What happened in Canterbury? The science behind the reality
• The earth moves: what happened, why and where?
• Liquefaction and the behaviour of buildings and infrastructure
Kelvin Berryman, Manager: Natural Hazards Research Platform, GNS Science
10.30
Morning tea
10.50
International Address: Developing successful emergency management teams
• Teams for innovation
• War gaming – exercises aimed to actually experience what and how decisions will be made during crises and the role that they can play in facilitating recovery and response
• Exercises - what are they really for?
David Parsons, Chair, Water Sector Infrastructure Assurance Advisory Group
Presentation still to come - please check back soon
11.40
Panel Discussion: Conveying information to the public during an emergency (Panel)
Chris Haines, Regional Operations Manager, St John
Area Commander Dan Coward, Area Manager, Christchurch Metro Area
Superintendent Dave Cliff, Canterbury District Commander, New Zealand Police
Dr Alistair Humphrey, Medical Officer of Health (Canterbury), Canterbury DHB
Don Rood, Head of News, Radio New Zealand
12.40
Lunch
1.30
The response – The national perspective
David Coetzee, National Controller, Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management
2.20
Communicating in a Disaster: Rethinking the Unthinkable
Catherine Arrow, FCIPR, Director Unlocked PR; Board Member, Global Alliance for Public Relations and Communication Management
3.00
Afternoon tea
3.15
Keynote Address: The response – A local perspective (Keynote)
Bob Parker, Christchurch City Mayor
4.05
Interactive roundtable discussions and simulations
Roundtable 1: The constant challenge to attract and retain volunteers
Volunteers are essential for emergency and disaster response and they need to be well trained and available to act; how can we attract more volunteers to the area and maintain them in the long term? What was the experience in Canterbury, during and after the earthquake? How do volunteers play their part in coordinated relief?
Facilitated by: Murray Sinclair, Manager, Civil Defence &
Emergency Management, Christchurch City Council
Roundtable 2: The use of powers and the different roles undertaken in emergencies
In a declared emergency extensive legal powers are conferred on the Civil Defence Controllers and the Medical Officer of Health. These powers include closure of buildings, requisition of premises, cordons and quarantine; failure to comply can result in fines or imprisonment. The use of these powers has implications for other agencies and substantially affects the lives of those in a declared emergency beyond the immediate effects of the emergency itself. Both the Medical Officer of Health and Civil Defence Controllers invoked powers during the Canterbury Earthquake; this roundtable will look at the benefits and impacts of compulsory powers in an emergency and the wider implications of the use of these powers.
Facilitated by: Dr Alistair Humphrey, Medical Officer of Health (Canterbury), Canterbury DHB
Michael Aitken, General Manager Community Services, Christchurch City Council
Roundtable 3: Undertaking practical exercises to simulate disaster situations
The use of practical exercises to simulate disaster simulations can help prepare both those involved in emergency response and the public in better understanding what to do in an emergency. What benefits do practical exercises have over theory? Do we conduct too much theory and not enough practical simulations?
Facilitated by: Sharyn Devereux-Blum, Director, Devereux-Blum Training & Development Ltd
Roundtable 4: Ensuring effective coordination and communication in the face of disaster
During an emergency it is essential that what is happening is clearly communicated to people and the appropriate agencies coordinate their response. What were your experiences in the Canterbury earthquake or in other situations where coordination and clear communication were key?
Facilitated by: Paul Blum, Director, Devereux-Blum Training & Development Ltd
5.00
End of day one & networking drinks
Agenda: Day 2
9.00
Opening remarks from the Chair
Clive Manley, Manager Civil Defence and Emergency
Management, Auckland Council
9.05
Case Study: Post emergency response to the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake in Italy
• The rebuilding process – the benefits and disadvantages of prolonging the time spent in tents in order to quickly rebuild homes that are of high quality and are earthquake safe
• Coordination of different agencies and organisations in the post emergency response
• Emergency management of lifelines – lessons learnt which will help future recovery efforts
• Issues involved in waste and debris management after the disaster
• A comparison of the L’Aquila earthquake to the Canterbury earthquake
Sonia Giovinazzi, Research Fellow, University of Canterbury
9.50
Case Study: Multi-agency coordination and integrating out-of-town staff during the Canterbury earthquake (Case Study)
• Rapid activation of the Canterbury Regional Emergency Coordination Centre – how was this possible?
• What happens when principal hazard risks are not taken into account during planning?
• Lessons learnt from working with other agencies in a significant coordinated response
• The role of the National Crisis Management Centre and staff from across the country coming to assist
• The influence of ‘adaptive management’ – a potential disaster in the making?
• Moving from the initial response to the recovery phase - continued co-operation and co-ordination
Jon Mitchell, Manager, Regional Emergency Management Office
10.40
Morning tea
10.55
An overview of the Canterbury recovery process – What has been going on since September 2010?
• The use of cordons and barricades in securing at risk areas
• The use of statutory powers and their application regarding dangerous buildings
• An overview of the basic lessons learnt so far
Esther Griffiths, Director, Sisirc Consulting
11.40
The best laid plans... Better than no plans
Doug Bent, Operations Manager, EQC
12.30
Lunch
1.15
What made Canterbury different from Chile? (Case Study)
• What levels of awareness and preparation were in place before each earthquake?
• From a structural engineering point of view, what lessons were learnt in Chile and how similar are these to those learnt in Canterbury despite the different scale of events?
• How were lifelines affected and how did the utilities respond in Chile compared with Canterbury?
Noel Evans MIPENZ, Chartered Professional Engineer, MNZSEE; Relationship Manager, Opus International Consultants Ltd
1.40
The role of social media in the Canterbury cleanup
Sam Johnson, Student, University of Canterbury; Member, Riccarton-Wigram Community Board
2.05
Integrated land use planning
Kristin Hoskin, Director, Kestrel Group; President – Oceania, International Association of Emergency Managers (IAEM)
2.30
Afternoon tea
2.45
Pre-emergency planning and preparedness – The role data plays in post disaster recovery
• Pre-arranged programmes and Service Level Agreements (SLA’s) with geospatial data and solutions providers that are triggered in the event of an emergency
• Coordinated national service and supply contracts
• International case study to be showcased
Mike Donald, Managing Director, Terralink International
3.10
The importance of business continuity planning at IRD (Case Study)
Glen Redstall, Portfolio Manager BCEM, IRD
3.35
Closing Keynote Address: Early Lessons Identified from the Canterbury Earthquake (Keynote)
John Hamilton, Director, Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management
4.20
Closing remarks from the Chair and end of Conference













